Post-Modern Feminism Is A Dick-Centered Faith-Based Religion. That’s All It Is. December 8, 2010Posted by FCM in authors picks, feminisms, liberal dickwads, PIV, pop culture, self-identified feminist men, thats mean, trans.
Tags: faith, pomo, privilege, religion, sex pozzies
pomo feminists are male-identified dick-pleasers. we already know that, what with their PIV-positive propaganda machine and marginalizing radfems, lesbians, spinsters, and everyone else who doesnt enthusiastically participate in their own destruction through dangerous PIV-centric sexuality. but theres more to it than merely being pleasing, to dicks (and penises!) pomo feminists (and pomo feminism itself) are so far up mens asses, that they are seeing out of mens eyes. and never their own.
for example, the privilege discussion. as undercover punk has recently and aptly described it, we (women) are all expected to acknowledge that we are wearing “privilege blinders,” and if it werent for our privilege blinders, we would be able to clearly see XYZ, whatever whomever is trying to sell us at the time, regarding the ways that we (women) supposedly oppress each other. and the ways we oppress men!
yes, thats what it comes down to, in the end. women oppress men, with all our gender-related power. granted, radical feminists dont take it quite that far, but when self-identified radical feminists insist on calling each other out on their various privileges, and making accusations of privilege-blindness instead of explaining the mechanism of the alleged oppression and the demonstrable harms that flow from it, their reasoning is just as flawed, and in the exact same ways, as the idiotic “reasoning” of the pomos, who invented cis-privilege and uncritically insist that women can and do oppress men by hurting their feelings, and invalidating their experiences, and stuff, and things. in other words, by being horrible bitches! yes, its feminist to call other women bitches now, and to demand that they femininely pamper your fee-fees. and its radical to insist that the source of womens suffering is…other women! yes it is, shut up.
anyhoo, regarding pomo feminism being dick-centered: it is. feminism has become a male-centered discourse now, or at least the pomo-version of it that passes as feminism in nearly every corner of the feminist blogosphere, and the mainstream too (thats not a coincidence). how can you tell? because it only makes sense when you look at it through mens eyes. just like regarding non-PIV-centric sexuality as ”prudish” and even “abstinence” in fact. but i digress.
heres what men hear, when women talk about male privilege: something that doesnt make any fucking sense, at all. they dont get it! in general, men cant and wont understand what male privilege is all about. they cant hear it. they cant see it, smell it, or taste it. and they dont understand it, at all. the GOOD ONES will take it on faith, that these things exist: that men rape. that PIV is dangerous to women. that all kinds and manners of shit happen to women, because we are women, and these things are done to us by men, because they are men. the GOOD ONES TAKE IT ON FAITH, that men are privileged, and that they exist, essentially, at womens expense. for self-identified feminist men, feminism is a religion. its faith-based. and male privilege, like, hurts womens feelings or something, i dont know, but teh feminists are pretty upset about it. the fact that what radical feminists say is also demonstrably true is beside the point.
enter pomo privilege rhetoric. now everyone is supposed to just take everything on faith, because thats how men do it, and men are the default humans afterall! self-identified feminist men are faking it, and now we are expected to fake it, too. when we hear something that doesnt make any fucking sense, at all, we are supposed to just shut up, and believe that its true. even things that arent demonstrably true, and even things that are, in fact, demonstrably false. like cis-privilege, for example. or, like young-privilege. and hurt-feelings-as-harm is as far as anyone is willing to go, when analyzing the harms that flow from oppressive systems, and even from abusive people. because when it comes down to it, MEN think that feminists are just big babies and are taking everything wrong, or that we are “offended” at various “inequalities”. and not directly, demonstrably and seriously harmed, by misogyny. see the difference?
now we are supposed to take it on faith, that women oppress other women…why, again? oh yeah, because our various, demonstrable female privileges are demonstrably harmful…because we are causing the death, disease, pregnancy, and poverty of other women by acting out our privilege, and thats why its so important that we just listen to other women, and believe what they say.
wait. no its not. thats why its at least arguably tolerable that self-identified feminist men take this shit on faith: because they wont have it any other way. because they dont or wont believe whats demonstrably true, about men, and about what they do to women.
but feminism as a dick-centered faith-based religion is not womens feminism. womens feminism (ie. feminism) is based in reality, on things that are demonstrably true, and that stand up to serious scrutiny. it has everything to do with actual, demonstrable harm, and nothing, really, to do with how we feel about it. and its a fucking insult to reduce radical feminist concerns to such trite bullshit, but frankly, its the best men have to offer to women, and to feminism. and we have to remember: thats all it is. pomo feminism is not feminism. its mens interpretation of it. thats all.