Thanks, Dickwads April 30, 2012Posted by FCM in authors picks, books!, entertainment, liberal dickwads, news you can use, pop culture.
Tags: innuendo, language, Riverhead Books, royal society of arts, rsa animate, Steven Johnson, steven pinker, Technology, where good ideas come from
mary daly reported that she often used phallocentric ideas and works as a springboard for her own work. no reason to reinvent the wheel afterall, and phallocentric works are literally everywhere. it would be difficult to even have a springboard in fact if you werent going to use men’s work for this purpose, seeing as how women were only allowed to learn to read and write very recently (and in many places, still arent).
so, to that end, i present these videos. left on youtube as anthropologic evidence of male supremacy and rape-culture, but now also being used to illustrate the following radical feminist points:
1. radfem writing and blogging is important. not just “womens” writing and not just “feminist” writing but radical feminist writing specifically is important, and will be useful in challenging male supremacy, assuming that what works for men will work for us too. granted, its a pretty big assumption and may be incorrect. either way, it says something interesting about our plight; and either way, it supports us in doing it, in case any of us were wondering whether there is any reason to believe, any reason at all, that radical feminist blogging might help.
why? because explicit language is known to create mutual knowledge, and mutual knowledge creates collective power to challenge dominance, and this dynamic is known and documented. and radical feminists use explicit language. radical feminists specifically do not pull our punches, and we do not use euphemisms to talk about what we mean. we do not call intercourse “sex” for example, and we do not call male violence against women “violence” or “crime” or mutual combat or domestic discord or heated arguments. we are the only ones who do this. and while it is important that all women, any women are allowed to add theirs to the “marketplace of ideas” what radical feminists in particular are doing holds promise for creating collective power and challenging dominance (under patriarchy, this means collective female power to challenge male supremacy). because of our explicit language. according to dickwad video #1, anyway!
BTW the good stuff starts at 7:48. everything up to there is egregious rape-apologism and blaming women for rape, when men lie to us with the specific intent to isolate us and commit rape. i told you he was a dickwad.
2. women-only spaces are important and necessary to challenging male supremacy. according to the second video, “good ideas” come from hunches colliding with other hunches, and this occurs when people interact with other people and their ideas play off each other. this does not happen in isolation as frequently or efficiently as it does in shared spaces where people talk freely about their ideas and share knowledge. and again, women who are having “hunches” and ideas of the radfem kind are going to help each other incubate and birth “good ideas” of the radfem kind. this dynamic has particular significance to radical women, and radical spaces.
and i guess there is a third point being illustrated here.
3. misogynists and male-supremacists will be particularly motivated to wipe radical feminist writing and radical spaces from the face of the earth. the import of explicit language and idea-sharing is common knowledge among men, and this knowledge is passed among men through various media like youtube. they know these dynamics exist and their potential for challenging dominance and generating good and even revolutionary ideas. the fact that they are trying specifically to destroy radical feminist writing logically follows, and their acts in furtherance of that are not unconsidered or random.
even if radical feminist writing and spaces wont work for us because the rules are different for us, misogynist men are showing us, by attacking us, that they see what we are doing and *they* have every reason in the world to believe that it might actually work. we are doing what they have always done, and their expectation (and fear) is that its going to work for us like its worked for them.
they might be wrong about that of course, as they constantly deny that the rules are different for us than they are for themselves, because patriarchy. but as is frequently the case, their response tells us quite a bit about them, and whats motivating them. for example, that their response is to attempt to destroy us tells us that they are, in fact, the dominant class, and they are demonstrating that they know it: assuming that these dynamics exist, and they know these dynamics exist — and according to them, they do — only a dominant class which was cognizant of its own dominance would have reason to behave as they are behaving. their denial that patriarchy exists, that they benefit from it and any plausible deniability that they know about all of it — ie. its deliberate — are thoroughly debunked.
thanks to these videos and the dickwads who aired them in public, we now have some information and context that we can consider, and decide to do something with it or not. of course, in the case of the first video, we had to sit through 7:47 of rape-culture to get there. interesting, that. its
almost exactly as if we were supposed to dissociate due to the rape-references and stop listening before he said anything that might be helpful to us.